The Linguistic Relativity Theory and Benjamin Lee Whorf
McAfee Christina.
// The McMaster Journal of Communication. – 2004. – Volume 1, Issue 1, Article
3. – 63p.Using sources, which address various theories of Linguistic Relativity - Rossi-Landi (1973), Penn (1972), Miller (1968), and Rollins (1980) – the unique aspects of these theories are explained. The intent of the paper is to expose Benjamin Lee Whorf not as the soul progenitor of the theory (that
language culture and thought are interrelated), but as a reviser of centuries of scholarship. The theories of Hamann, Herder, Humboldt, Boas, and Sapir are examined and conclusions are made on their influences on and differences from the Whorfian Hypothesis.
3. – 63p.Using sources, which address various theories of Linguistic Relativity - Rossi-Landi (1973), Penn (1972), Miller (1968), and Rollins (1980) – the unique aspects of these theories are explained. The intent of the paper is to expose Benjamin Lee Whorf not as the soul progenitor of the theory (that
language culture and thought are interrelated), but as a reviser of centuries of scholarship. The theories of Hamann, Herder, Humboldt, Boas, and Sapir are examined and conclusions are made on their influences on and differences from the Whorfian Hypothesis.
Amazon 
Barnes & Noble 
Bookshop.org
¿Quieres añadir una librería? Contáctanos a través de support@z-lib.fm
Convierte archivos
Más resultados de búsqueda
Otros beneficios 
![刘子超 [刘子超] — 失落的卫星 : 深入中亚大陆的旅程（“全球真实故事奖”特别关注作品，罗新、许知远一致推荐！ 中亚版《寻路中国》。）](https://s3proxy.cdn-zlib.se/covers200/collections/userbooks/4ce5a57c004dc93422455fc91e20dd288d7775ede1a8abecd2270b381ac2597a.jpg)
Términos más frecuentes
Listas de libros relacionados
